ANALISA KEPUASAN MASYARAKAT KOTA DAN KABUPATEN MOJOKERTO TERHADAP PROYEK PENGENDALIAN BANJIR PERKOTAAN DENGAN METODE IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

  • Mohammad Sofyan Magister Manajemen Universitas Pancasila
Keywords: urban flooding, community satisfaction

Abstract

The portrait of the social issues following the latest public participation to be integrated in the urban flood control program in the pre-construction, construction and post-construction. The portrait is expected to be considered in order to eliminate the negative impacts and maximize the positive impact of urban flood control construction program in a participatory manner from the perspective of key stakeholders, advocates, and policy makers related to the program. The purpose of this study is to encourage the presence of a sense of belonging, responsibility, and foster key stakeholders, advocates, and policy makers on a river normalization program/construction of flood control infrastructure Brangkal good time at pre-construction, construction and post-construction. IPA is the use of the method in people's satisfaction levels are entered in quadrants on a map Importance Performance Matrix. The study shows that a flood control project that has been built, not in accordance with the expectations of society. The coordination with the Contractor at the time of project implementation, socialization of the City at the time prior to the implementation of the project, and the socialization of the Department of Irrigation Works in the moments before the implementation of the project, is in conformity with perceived by the public. The socialization of the River Center at the time of completion of the project, and Community Involvement in project implementation performance is not too special. Socialization of the City at the time of completion of the project, and the socialization of the Department of Irrigation Works at the time of completion of the project and is perceived by the public too much.

References

ABrandt, D.R. (2000). An Outside-In Approach to Determining Customer Driven Priorities for Improvement and Innovation. White Paper Series, Volume 2.

Crompton dan Duray. (1985). Importance Performance Analysis.

Hasibuan, SP. Malayu. (2004), Manajemen SDM. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Latu, T.M. dan Everett, A.M. (2004). Review of Satisfaction Research and Measurement Approaches. New Zealand: Wellington.

Martilla, J. A., dan James J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, Volume 41, No. 1 (Jan.,1977), pp. 77-79.

Nurdiyanto dan Fauzi. (2009). Perencanaan Normalisasi dan Perbaikan Tanggul Kali Brangkal Kabupaten Mojokerto.

Robert J. Kodoatie dkk. (2002). Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Dalam Otonomi Daerah, Yogyakarta: Andi.

Robert J. Kodotie dan Sugiyanto. (2002). Banjir (Beberapa Penyebab Dan Metode Pengendaliannya Dalam Perspektif Lingkungan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Robert J. Kodoatie dan Roestam Sjarief. (2008). Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Terpadu. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Robert J. Kodoatie dan Roestam Sjarief. (2010). Tata Ruang Air. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Published
2016-12-08
How to Cite
Sofyan, M. (2016). ANALISA KEPUASAN MASYARAKAT KOTA DAN KABUPATEN MOJOKERTO TERHADAP PROYEK PENGENDALIAN BANJIR PERKOTAAN DENGAN METODE IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS. JURNAL EKSEKUTIF, 13(2). Retrieved from https://jurnal.ibmt.ac.id/index.php/jeksekutif/article/view/121
Section
Articles